Deesk06 wrote: I do enjoy the 183. I like the fov it provides with my scope. Though I do at times find myself often wishing I had a wider fov. I would have went for the 1600 but I despise the microlensing issue. I wouldn't touch the 1600 for that reason, but that's only my opinion. I'd rather deal with amp glow than microlensing.
Why not go for the QHY 294? It's the same size as the 1600(I think) with better QE than both 1600 and 183. If it had come out sooner I would have went with that over the 183. I like the QHY varient has the possibility to go 1x1 to unlock the sensors full potential. Two cameras in one!
wvreeven wrote: There was an issue with the lenses on the pixels of the sensor causing interference patterns. Not sure which models were affected but I don’t see it. I guess dithering helps