×

INDI Library v2.0.7 is Released (01 Apr 2024)

Bi-monthly release with minor bug fixes and improvements

Unable to use Online Astrometry

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
As I have very long FL sometimes online astrometry is only one that will result with solving.

In astroberry it worked flawlesly ,but now when I upgraded to most recent stellarmate, it refuses to send anyting to online astrometry.

I have turned off position, scale, switched to Online Astrometry and set Built In Method for solver for Star Extraction.

Is there something I am missing?

Please check you have sufficient stars in the image, the indicated FOV is correct, and the necessary index files are installed. Enable Alignment Logging in Setup Tab -> Logs to get detailed information on the failure.
3 months 5 days ago #99104

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1227
  • Thank you received: 567
Not sure why online doesn't work, but I'll be we can get offline working.
Please post an image that you can't get to solve with the internal solver.
FWIW, I have a FOV of about 1/2 degree wide with my 10" RC and have no issues solving.

Hy
3 months 4 days ago #99121

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13

Rendering Error in layout Message/Item: array_keys(): Argument #1 ($array) must be of type array, null given. Please enable debug mode for more information.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
Here is another one
nova.astrometry.net/user_images/9384463#annotated

It is same using default 4 Small Scale solve and 1 Default
3 months 4 days ago #99145

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1227
  • Thank you received: 567
Please upload these two files somewhere so I can download the fits files onto my machine.
3 months 4 days ago #99146

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
You can dowoad it from astrometry:
File Attachment:


Right click on solve.fits and click save as
3 months 3 days ago #99148

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1227
  • Thank you received: 567
Did not work for me, tried that unsuccessfully before and just retried same. It says "This does not look like a FITS file". It is only 4Mb.
Please post your original file somewhere and send the link.
Hy
3 months 3 days ago #99149

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
Ooooh ok, here are they. Mind you this two might be a bit different ones as I save and manually upload all the the time to astrometry but situation is the same,

drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qmRNUa3v...MnakjalLohCGp0hD9KHt
Last edit: 3 months 3 days ago by Outta.
3 months 3 days ago #99160

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1227
  • Thank you received: 567
Got your two images.

I am debugging this with the FITS Viewer's solver, and you can try and reproduce my experiments.
Open the fitsviewer solver, which is documented in the KStars handbook, currently on page 169
docs.kde.org/trunk5/en/kstars/kstars/kst...f#fits-viewer-solver

I was able to solve solve2.fits with the configuration below using my align profile



and here's the Align profile I had. I didn't play around with parameters, it was the first solve I tried with it once I set "use scale" to the right value, which I found in the fits header.
(It may not be the default, you can play around with it, but I'd be surprised if there are major changes with other similar numbers.



Note that only 7 stars were found, so that is pretty few stars for a plate solve.

In the other image, solve.fits, there were only 4 stars detected and the solve failed for me, but that image is much worse quality. That is, look like there is a guiding bump or star trail (i.e. several stars are doubled). Something like that would cause solving issues.

Hy
3 months 3 days ago #99172
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
Oh yes the secondary one is very bad, as I said it was probably different than original, but online astrometry does that one as well

nova.astrometry.net/user_images/9391056#annotated

I will try your parameters, but suprise suprise, it is cloudy :)

Also, can you try using Online Astrometry as default with bad one so we can report bug to Jasem? Maybe star extraction is happening even for Online astrometry and that is why it fails?
3 months 3 days ago #99175

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1227
  • Thank you received: 567
You can try the fitsviewer solver even if it is cloudy!
Use load that image into fitsviewer and solve it.

Sorry, I don't have time in the next week or two to mess with other things.
Hy
3 months 3 days ago #99177

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
Ok that is interesting turn of events, when I click Solve on FitsViewer, whole kstars crashes. There is nothing significant in logs.

[2024-02-19T11:21:05.931 CET INFO ][ org.kde.kstars.fits] - Saved FITS file: "/tmp/solvera011eff4b132428cbf4914cd6270123c.fits"
3 months 2 days ago #99189

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.638 seconds